Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement

Woodbury ordered to change speech ordinance

Email Sign up for Breaking News Alerts
news Woodbury, 55125
Woodbury Minnesota 8420 City Centre Drive 55125

Just a few weeks after a Woodbury resident filed a lawsuit against the city for restricting public speeches, a federal court judge ordered the city to change a law requiring citizens to obtain permits before speaking publicly.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In February, The Center for Religious Expression filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court challenging a city ordinance that regulates speeches in parks and recreational areas on behalf of Woodbury resident James Grinols.

City officials met in a closed session Wednesday to discuss the case then released a statement announcing their plan to update the ordinance.

“City of Woodbury officials seriously considered the issues brought forth by Grinols and have agreed to propose an amended ordinance to the City Council that is more in line with current case law,” according to the statement. “In reaching this agreement, the city is acting in good faith to balance a person’s right to free speech with the interests of those who rent recreational facilities for private group use.”

Grinols said he was denied a permit to speak about gay marriage at Carver Lake Park in 2013 on the grounds that another event was already being held there.

“First amendment is the First Amendment for that reason,” he said. “If you can’t have a pretty easy access to this type of thing in a large park you’d wonder where you could do it.”

The city ordinance reads, “No processions, parades, pageants, ceremonies, exhibitions, celebrations, training exercises, speeches, entertainment or other public gatherings shall be allowed to pass through or take place in any public street, site or open space except by permit issued by the public safety department.”

City officials say they hope to have all matters resolved in time for the summer recreational season.

Woodbury was also ordered to pay Grinols’ attorney’s fees and costs.

Grinols said he wasn’t seeking damages, just for the city to recognize the importance of making the parks available for all sorts of public uses.

“I get $1 in judgment,” he said, “which I guess I’ll frame.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement